May 4, 2014

Samuel: [Trying to rearrange Lea’s clothing, to the merriment of the audience] You’ve never seen that, have you? What about this part?

It has to come up.

S: What about this? [Laughter] Now remind me to change it back before she comes up or she’s going to be really confused.

So how are you?

Good.

S: Better than you thought?

Better than I thought.

S: So how did your April homework go? Did you do good things? “Homework? Did I have homework? Oh my gosh, that was a month ago!”

You were going to work on doing good things that nobody knew about but you, to help others, to be at your best, to do random acts of kindness, yes? So do I guess none of you have done that?

Here’s your homework for May. [Laughter] Consciously purposefully, choose to do something good for somebody anonymously. It doesn’t need to be you’ve got to send them money, it doesn’t need to be anything huge, but something that you are consciously doing to serve another person. The more you serve, the happier you are. And if what you are wanting is to be happy, give of yourself. Give of yourself. Give of yourself. Because isn’t that the best you’ve got?

There was a child about ten to fifteen years ago named Jarrett, who had cancer. He was at Kentucky Children’s Hospital to be treated, and he came up with the idea of giving out toys to all the other kids on the floor. And so he created something called Jarrett’s Joy Cart and that became his mission in life, going around the corridor with the cart, and visiting with all the other children, the kids, and delivering toys to them. And I . . . in contemplating that, I realize how much joy that filled his life with.

S: Nice. True. Very nice.

Why are you here? What’s your purpose here?

To live love.

S: To live love. To learn how to live love. Because although it is the most natural part about you, because you are a being drenched in love—“You are a love sponge, baby,” although that does come with a kind of odd picture, doesn’t it?—you are here as an ambassador of the greatest love, the love that is Source. You are a function of that love in this world, and living that love, not just talking about it, living that love with every breath, with every conscious effort of your being, living that love, is what you are here to do. And love is generous, and love is kind, and love is compassionate, and love is thoughtful. And all of those things provide means to serve one another. And by one another, I don’t just mean the person sitting next to you; I mean the person driving behind you, and the person across the country, and the person in another country. Serving one another, serving humanity, and the animal kingdom, and the plant kingdom, and—what the heck—even the mineral kingdom. Giving love. And because it is a pattern in your deepest self, because it is what you are here about, it makes you happy. You feel good passing love along. So when I give you an assignment that says “Serve others anonymously,” what I’m asking you to do ultimately then is to do what you’re here to do and make yourself happy by it.

Tonight I get to be happy because it is Question and Answers, and I love Question and Answers. I do notice however that I do not have my Sources up here. And Stuart, do you need to do anything insofar as . . . All right good.

Source One and Source Two?

Watch out for the sleeve . . . 

S: Were you afraid I was going to burn myself there, that I might catch fire or something? Now you’ve got something to do, don’t you? All right.

[. . .]

S: Never do what again?

She’ll [Lea] never wear something like that again.

S: Ah. And shall we count on that?

Maybe, because she might be embarrassed.

S: Now I wasn’t actually going to do it that way. Look at that. I think there’s been a little assumption in the room. We’ll get to those after, how about that?

What I want to do, actually, is put a little more responsibility in you to be as clear as possible, and part of that is because I think that sometimes there are five different versions of the same question here, and whoever is being Source is having to read through it and try to make sure that everything is covered, whereas if you just hear, “My question has been covered,” you’re going to get it.

You keep sending things up here and that is nice, but I really think they’re going to end up at the newsletter if you don’t raise your hand and it gets asked.

Who is Source One and who is Source Two?

[Suzie] Mary of course is Source One.

S: What I’d like you two to do is to pick whose question gets answered first—and second and third, whatever—but also pay attention that if you think it’s going to be a question that isn’t asked in a way that’s going to get an answer you either correct that or get them to correct it. And, join in if you think that you want to add to the answer for that. Suzie, Mary, Source One, Source Two—I’ll be Source Three. Shall we?

[Suzie] We shall. Okay, Kathy, Suzanne and David.

You’ve talked about humans and dogs having a special type of relationship with each other, and I was wondering if there is one between humans and horses, and if so, what it is about.

S: Do you ride horses?

I just started.

S: Anybody very familiar with riding horses, who has done it for a long time? For those of you who have done it for a long time, do you think horses are . . . I was going to say psychic, but that’s not really the word I wanted to look for. Do they read your mind?

Yes.

S: They absolutely do. When you have a good strong bond with a horse, a mind link is created that’s quite unlike a mind link with a dog or a cat or a tiger or a rat. I sound like Dr. Seuss, don’t I? Horses became creatures that would be capable of helping humanity. They started this big [indicating a small size], like wild cats in Africa. Over very, very, very long periods of time—oh, gosh, how many earths ago?—they became what you think of as a horse. Always, always ready for domestication, always capable of having a bond—well, they’re capable of more than one—but capable of a bond beyond what the rider is telling them physically. And everybody close to, who is a regular rider, will tell you, “The horse knows what I want before I signal it. The horse protects me from myself, the horse . . .” and on and on. It’s a very powerful bond. What does it give you?

A chance to improve my communication skills.

S: Nice, nice. To improve your communication skills, your balance, to take a load off yourself with a willing bearer. It’s a real gift. Enjoy that. Gwendolyn would always say the outside of a horse is good for the inside of a person. And it’s true.

In Star Weaving, at the very end, we connect to Alcyone as the heart of this galaxy and our own heart. I want you to explain why Alcyone is the heart of this galaxy. I’m also kind of confused because I’ve recently learned that Alcyone, the star in the Pleiades, is younger than our sun. So I’m not quite sure how that figures in with the heart of the galaxy since it came into existence after our sun did.

S: When I tell you to listen to your heart and not your head, am I asking you to pull out the echocardiogram?

No.

S: No. Although that is a good way to listen. What I’m doing instead is making reference to a kind of energy. And the heart of this galaxy is that area in which, for energetic reasons that I don’t really need to take time with right now, inflow—this is the easiest away to say it—strong Source-aligned creation energy comes through that area. So it’s kind of like a little love spot.

Thank you.

S: You’re welcome.

[Suzie] David.

I tried to ask this before. In manifesting, we’re asked to be specific, but then we’re also told to throw in this codicil of this or something better. So my question is how to reconcile not getting what we asked for as being not manifesting versus accepting it as something better.

S: Thoughts?

[Suzie] Mary?

[Mary] My first thought is that what I’m asking for specifically and when I throw in the codicil of this or something better is that, and I get the something other than what I specifically asked for, that may have been really what I wanted or needed. I just didn’t know it. So I like to throw in “this or something better” because I’m not very specific in knowing what I want. I like the “this is really nice, too.”

S: Good.

[Suzie] I think for me, if I don’t get what I asked for, I know immediately I feel that whatever happened is the better. So I feel that if I ask for the something better, and I get what I don’t perceive as the something better, within a pretty quick amount of time I realize that it was the better choice.

It sounds like a cop-out.

S: To put that in a bit of a different way, but going the way they were going: You are remarkable, you are intelligent, you are perceptive, you are an amazing human being, but you don’t know everything there is to know. I hate that part; I’m sorry about it, but there you go. Because of that, you can be asking for something that has nothing to do with the compact you made in coming here. You might very specifically, carefully, creatively, be asking for something that will do you harm or, because you’re not able to see it down the road, might interfere with something else, somebody else, some thing that is part of the greater picture. Because of that, and because manifestation is a co-creatorship, you’re not doing it by yourself. This isn’t like, “I studied for the test. I am responsible for what I checked off.” It’s not that. It’s “I am working with a greater function of energy to bring about this or something even better.” You are recognizing that co-creation aspect. You are recognizing that you don’t have all of those answers. You are recognizing that there may be more out there.

Additionally, just as a little aside, you have to remember too that you do get what you ask for. The thing is, when it’s not a part of your compact, when it’s not a part of what is the best for you, it’s going to take so much longer to manifest, because it doesn’t have that greater creative potential working with it, that you might not be in form anymore by the time it finally comes to you. Most of the time, the things that you ask for that do not come about, when you are finished with this experience you are so relieved they did not. Really. It’s not a cop-out, and it’s actually not a conflict. It’s a way of saying, “We are making this happen. I might not see it all, so cover me.”

[Mary] Can I add something?

S: Absolutely.

[Mary] It also helps me work on acceptance and trust issues, that really everything is happening for my highest good.

S: Very true.

[Suzie] And I don’t have to feel guilty if it doesn’t.

S: Nice.

[Mary] Mary Claire, Steven, Louise. That’s it.

S: Remember that side of the room, too.

Samuel, you said here and there about “greens over grains.” We all know about the gluten-free . . . that gluten grains are not good in your system, all glue in your system. But grains in general—you made just a very brief remark once that they caused inflammations. What I’m asking is what grains—obviously wheat is the worst—what grains are better than others, or are they all pretty much inflammation-inducing? And of all those, are there any that you would say, “Well, if you’re going to eat grains, these are better for you than others.” I would like for you to explain.

S: If you were not growing crops not on acres but on miles of fields, if you were not using—well, in your country—seeds that have the pesticides already grown into them, if you actually had a grain that was healthy—in its natural state, pure, not hybridized, but back to its ancient beginning—you would not have these problems. The problem with grains is that by their nature they suck up toxins like you suck up love. It is like eating a sewer sponge. It’s not only grains, but grains particularly; they hold all kind of toxins and create in you two very bad things. One of them is that your body gets used to it. It creates a kind of acceptance of a lower level of health. Those of you who have removed grain from your diet, did you find you felt better? Yes?

When I removed grains, this hand . . . I have arthritis. Looks like this one. This hand is totally different. This one looks this way because I use a mouse constantly so I’m inflaming it by motion. But the grains really made a difference in this one, and overall in inflammation.

S: Right, right. Visual aids, that’s even better.

So not only does it create a lower level of health that becomes your normal “this is as good as I can feel,” but it also feeds you its toxins, and they build up in your system and they create some very big difficulties in the body with your hormones, with your autoimmune system, with the inflammatory condition. So, which ones? The clean, pure, original ones.

Even the organic ones are probably still not advisable.

S: I don’t know, but darlin’, I can tell you this. If anybody could find a grain that was good, it would be you.

I found an heirloom grain that’s grown in a country that is completely organic.

S: You want to hear what?

Bhutanese red rice.

S: Bhutanese red rice.

You can buy it at any of the local stores here that sell natural foods. It’s not that much more expensive than the others. It’s organic, and it’s heirloom, and it’s grown in a country that doesn’t allow pesticides.

[Suzie] Boo-ya for Bhutan.

So the ancient grains aren’t sewer sponges?

S: If you took an ancient grain and covered it over with pesticides and put it into a soil that was depleted, it would become a sewer sponge. But you want one that is an ancient grain that has been properly grown.

[Suzie] Steven?

At the Retreat, you taught us a manifestation process, and you asked us at the end to say thank you and forget about it. We also, many times when we try to manifest healing, send energy to another, we do that repeatedly. And amplification I think is part of the manifestation process as well. So I’m wondering what sorts of manifestations would profit more from a single shot versus that which would require repeated sending?

S: Any thoughts?

[Mary] Not a clue.

[Suzie] Acute things.

S: [Whispers to Suzie] It depends.

[Suzie] Well, I think it depends.

S: And what it depends on is, remember that at the Retreat I also spoke to you about your need to find the many different ways you can learn to do manifestation. I gave you several ways to work on the main manifestation that I gave you. You need to find the one that works for you. For some people, repeating it over and over isn’t about a lack of trust. For others, repeating it over and over is all about a lack of trust. If for you it’s about a lack of trust and you only put it out there once and let it go and at toning you hear it come up again, just sort of hum to yourself at that point, knowing that the person sitting right next to you might be one who does need it over and over and over. Also, there are times in your life in which for, whatever reason, letting go of something isn’t so easy for you. “I know better, I didn’t mean to do that.” And it’s all about you knowing where you are at the time.

So look at it both ways. Give yourself a quick check: “How are my trust levels going? Pretty good. All right. So I’m just going to pretend everything is in the addendums and codicils.” That’s cosmic addendums and codicils.

[Suzie] Louise.

Samuel, you had said when The Plan for earth and humanity was created, you voted against free will. I wondered if you might explain how humanity would develop without free will.

S: Somebody asked me once, “Who outvoted you?” Let’s see.

[Suzie] It depends.

S: I relate a whole lot of things to training a dog, which I have come to learn is a little bit insulting to you, so am trying to move this out of a dog illustration.

Let’s say you have a child, all right? Some of you have to really work at imagining and some of you can just remember. You have a child and that child is an infant, maybe born a month ago or a couple of months ago. You want that child to be safe and happy and good, right? So you do everything you can to meet all of its needs, don’t you?

That wasn’t a trick question. Of course you do. If you were relying on free will for that infant, you would put it to bed and when it cried, you’d say, “Take care of yourself.” When it got hungry, you’d put it out in the yard and say “Forage on, buddy.” And when it’s made its little body all sewer like, you’d say, “Change your own nappy.” Because that’s free will. Whereas not-free will is, “I recognize that you don’t know this. I will help you until you reach that point that you do.” Now, I think I might have done better with a dog-training illustration, but ultimately that’s it. I want you to realize, for a little more perspective, that the human experiment repeatedly failed. Humans and “power over” is a big mistake. So removing what seems to be the big problem seems to be the most compassionate, loving, and kind thing there could be. The problem with compassionately and lovingly removing free will is that what you learn does not hold the same way. So free will wins.

[Mary] We have Martin, Gail, Jeanean, and David.

Samuel, I got to go on the power trip with you. Had a big time, had a big time. Specifically we went to Egypt on the last part and I was able to go with Jim and Stuart and Marj and Brooke and his watermelon up into the Great Pyramid, Cheops. My question is, why were those chambers that we went into, why were they different, built different than the outside of the pyramid, different stone, different cuts, really tight joints. How did they make those, and why did they make those chambers if they weren’t built as a tomb?

S: Do you think they were not built as a tomb?

[Mary] I’m thinking you told us on a later trip is that it wasn’t a tomb, but the only thing that makes sense is a tomb.

S: The first thing that I’m going to say in answer to that is that’s actually a much bigger question than you think. But the answer is a lot simpler than you might think it is. Being that you are a contractor, I’m going to use a bit of that for this. Are the methods in which you built thirty years ago different than the way you build now?

Yes.

S: Were the standards of thirty years ago different than now?

Yes.

S: Were the places you could build different than they are now?

Yes

S: All of the above. And that’s because things change in many ways. This isn’t answering the question behind what he’s asking; it’s answering the surface of it first. The pyramids were built over a very long period of time, and what is outside is just the casing, the weathering, for what is inside. Now as is the case with so many ancient homes, tombs, all of it—in fact even today in many countries—what you see on the outside is practical. What you see on the inside is palatial. All right. So building purpose had changed. All right. Next part, getting to the why. The pyramids are beacons, like the Empire State Building and the Space Needle. They are “This is the biggest thing around here, and it’s going to convey the power of our times.” Kind of like buildings now. But everything that they did was oriented in two ways: one of them to fortuitous star arrangements, and, second, to increasing energy and status. That’s not so different now, is it? I would tell you that the pyramid is not about Cheops. What was built was a temple; what it became was a tomb. Anything more to add to that?

[Suzie] It doesn’t depend on that.

Nope.

[Suzie] Gail.

Several years ago you spoke to us about this country becoming bilingual.

S: What language?

Spanish and English. I see it more and more happen the older I grow, and it’s been phenomenal.

S: I’m going to make a tiny correction, though. I did not say that the country was moving toward becoming bilingual. I said that if you want to be able to communicate, you need to learn Spanish, because there are going to be more and more and more Hispanic/Latin peoples coming here, settling here, and knowing that language is going to be necessary.

I spoke to a young friend, and her friends are in Spanish immersion in high school which didn’t exist certainly when I was a young child. Small towns along the border areas are conducting business in Spanish. There’s now a Spanish classical music station on NPR. These are really exciting things to me, but the thing that stuck in my mind when you made this statement awhile back, you said [added], “I hope.” Can you be more specific about what you mean by “I hope”?

S: It actually had to do with language. The more languages you know, the more expanded your mind becomes. Lakshmi, how many languages do you have?

Maybe five, six. I know five.

S: And then you can write others, and read but not speak others.

I can write [. . .]

S: How many Americans do you know who have six languages, not because they studied a whole bunch of languages, but because it was a part of their life? Even if they did study them, it’s the exception, not the rule, isn’t it? In fact, most in this culture know how many languages?

One.

Half. [Laughter]

S: I’ve got about half, too, so I get that.

What happens to your mind as you learn another language is a very beautiful thing. You become not only better able to re-wire at will, because that’s what it takes. How many of you dream in another language? A few. It’s so stunning when it comes to that place where you can actually dream in that language. It changes the way your mind works, but better than that, it changes your receptivity to others. When you are capable of speaking in Russian, you’re not afraid to go to Russia. When you’re sitting in the emergency room at the hospital and there is a mother with a baby that is very, very sick and she can only speak Spanish and you know what’s being said, you can serve and help. It opens important doors. It’s good for you.

[Suzie] Jeanean.

At the Retreat, you said the kingdom work in Cambodia would be moving through time, healing group consciousness, and healing the land. To do the healing work for group consciousness is a Shining work. We would literally be re-seeding that country. In addition, Cambodia was the first seeding for Sacred Status. What does it mean to be the first seeding for Sacred Status?

S: [To Mary and Suzie] What do you think it means?

[Mary] You don’t ask the question if you don’t know the answer.

S: Very good! Source One got it!

Think about it. Sacred Status had a beginning somewhere. Now, what is Sacred Status? It’s a process, yes. That’s right.

When mass consciousness believes they are more than their forms, that they’re connected to a greater . . .

S: When more of the life force in this world, not just humans, more of the life force in this world recognizes that they are a part of a much greater—ideally a Source-connected, but it doesn’t even have to be that—experience, then Sacred Status has started.

But, Cambodia—now of course it wasn’t always those lines, nor was it that name, so I’m going to say instead the Mekong and the lands around the Mekong— were the first seeding. Think for a moment about where that area and people are now, and come up with the exact opposite to get what that seeding’s for. Where they are now is what? Subservient, impoverished, deathly impoverished, very poor image of capability.

Now turn those things around, and those are just a few to push this along, of power, of unity, of abundant living. That needs to be reactivated, but it’s so dead that it’s going to be effectually a re-seeding. Now a seeding, mind you, is a frequency, and you meet that frequency. Is it really hard work?

Yes.

S: Very few, very rare beings. It’s not that the work is so hard; it’s the focus that is so hard. Is it possible?

[Suzie] Yeah! We’ve done it eight or nine times now.

S: And you’ve seen it carry out beyond. And so, you are saying?

I understand why it needed to be re-seeded and what the focus of the re-seeding is. I understand all of that. What does it mean to be the first seeding? Very specifically [. . .]?

S: You’ve got to start somewhere.

For Sacred Status . . . I mean, we’ve done . . . Is that because of the re-seeding?

S: And yes, I was misunderstanding your question. Thank you, thank you. Yes.

Specifically, how is it that this seeding is going to affect Sacred Status so much that it will be called, looking back on it, the first seeding for Sacred Status?

[Mary] That’s what I clarified.

S: Yes, thank you very much. [Laughter]

Your world right now is on a balance, isn’t it? You read the newspaper and—well let’s pretend here, all right, for the sake of what I’m saying—and there’s just as much good news as there is bad news; you’ve got a choice either way; sorry. Massive change is coming about. You are at a place in which the technology you have today is going to be ridiculous; not a year from now, a month from now. What you know scientifically about your planet, about life upon it, about the tiniest piece of form, everything that you know is changing right now. The power of change is so great right now that if you did not know that change creates chaos, you would think there was something dark and horrible going on in the world, because there is so much chaos, whereas really it is only because there is so much change right now.

This work will be the first time that the life force on the area, the planet’s connection, and a creation force will be brought together to direct that change. And David, I’m allowed. I don’t have to say, “This or something better.” So, I will not say this is the first seeding for Sacred Status, but when you look back, I am confident—I won’t guarantee it, but I am confident—that the world will look back at it and say, “What happened in July of ’14 that things started really moving a more positive way?” You will see that.

Yay!

S: Will you be there? You will see it.

Samuel, a couple of years ago you turned gravity upside down and said it was a push rather than pull. And then in the newsletter you spoke of gravity as a function of the electromagnetic interaction with the inner core of the Earth. And I just can’t understand that at all, and I was wondering if you could make it clear and maybe even re-state gravity’s role in why the planets go around the sun the way they do.

S: [Coughs] In two minutes or less, right? I wasn’t actually coughing, I was just playing.

Your science likes to think that gravity is sort of like you have a magnet under your feet, holding you down. Really . . . the iron in the blood. In the dimension of form—the Source Field—you with me? Sort of Theory of Everything-ish. Source field contains energy. Energy is frequency, right? Frequency affects frequency—yes—creating, for want of a better word in this kind of time, friction. So, everything within the Source Field affects everything within the Source Field, and in doing so, torsion creates a friction. Friction brings change. You know that in the small version, your everyday life; you know it in the large version. Right science teacher?

[Suzie] Yes.

S: There you go. Friction creates change. Friction also creates, in this energy field, what your science like to think of as immutable forces. You’ve got a strong force and a weak force. But those forces actually are symptoms, if you will, functions of the change that comes about because of the friction.

Now, I’m really making this simple and fast. I’m leaving out tremendous amounts of things that would maybe help more. If you want, see if you can talk Jeanean into adding it into her newsletter interview. Should I have not said that?

No, no.

S: So, the point of change . . . You remember my talking about the power in the point of change? As all energy changes due to fluctuations within the field, due to movement within the field, due to the effect of one hitting on another, hitting on another, like in a pond—yes?—you have an energy creation out of that friction. That energy creation is what makes me say it is a push that you call gravity, that you think of as a pull. It’s the point of perfect balance when the magnetic effect caused by friction is in perfect balance—that point of balance—with change. If you put a strong magnet here and a strong magnet here, what do you have here [between them]?

You’ve got a magnetic field.

S: And if I put something in that field . . .

It will stay in place right in the middle of the two.

S: Right. You call it gravity.

That point of balance in the middle?

S: That was easy, wasn’t it, if I’d just started with that visual?

[Suzie] That was a good one. Lillibeth then Carol.

Several Guardians have medical conditions, and that requires them to have frequent doctors’ appointments or diagnostics, or even surgery or ongoing treatments, and we’ve kind of dubbed that as medical missionary work because when we are going into those situations, we are working at our highest, we are working at our best. We are broadcasting energy to anyone around us to help us, to be working at their highest and best, to be filled with love and competence and wisdom and all these things. And some of these conditions may be in our blueprints.

I’m wondering if in the process of all that, not only that we’re helping just by broadcasting energy and love into these situations, but our forms are in a transition and they’re transfiguring. Is it also possible that the medical missionary work in that also contains—and we are literally, energetically changing, teaching medicine how to work with these particular conditions in a much higher way to heal them or even to eradicate them from the planet as a disease. Would you elaborate on that and answer that question.

S: Pretty quickly, I think, which is good because Stuart is saying, “Shut up. Stop.” You think I’m not looking at you, don’t you?

The medical missionary work has nothing to do with any of it because that is a gift that you give when you go to the doctor. It would be the Kroger missionary work if you do it at the grocery store, or it would be the car-repair missionary work if your car broke down a lot. It’s making use of what you can do where you are, and you have seen the kinds of differences it makes.

The blueprint almost always has either a primary or secondary purpose. A serious illness that comes into the life of a high-frequency being that has been chosen before incarnating is going to have the purpose of making change in you and change in those you are around hopefully positive. Hopefully. Is there ever a situation in which somebody comes in with a disease or a difficulty and they go to the doctors and do what they can, and they’re able to help change medicine because of it? Absolutely yes. I know it with this form to be true. I know it from what some of you have done by changing consciousness. The Form has doctors who want to eat raw because it has made such difference. Who never looked into alternatives until somebody they cared about brought up some science about alternatives. The good thing is, those who are in medicine are in medicine because they want to help, not because they hate people and want to make life harder for them.

Those are dentists. [Laughter]

S: Oops.

And even when they don’t think what you are wanting to do is going to have much effect, they know that the mind can do amazing things for the body. Placebos work.

So you are introducing them to something that maybe in their head they are thinking, “Ah, well, it’s a placebo so what? It’s not going to hurt anything, so go ahead. Give it a try.” And they see a change. Then the next time you say, “Can I do this instead?” they’ll be a little more willing and a little more willing.

The Form’s pretty much got the women’s health center all recognizing that there are other ways to heal the body, and if what we are for is healing the body, then we’re going to look at other ways. And I would say that probably many of you have your health centers fixed the same way.

Now just one more little thing to toss in here: Very, very often, when a high frequency Guardian has a really what you would call “bad” illness, ninety-nine point ninety-nine percent of the time, it’s blueprint. It’s there for a purpose. And when you work out that purpose, most of the time you work out the disease.

Some years ago we made a shift from what you called 4-3-2 to 5-3-2. And I am wondering now with Transfiguration have we made a shift to something different than 5-3-2, and if so, what would it be?

S: We have not. It’ll be a long time in 5-3-2. Ascension, probably.

All right. Thank you, particularly for the extra time. Thank you, Stuart, for not panicking. I love—love—Questions and Answers because you get such a variety of things. I also love it because I like knowing what’s on your mind. Tonight I would say some pretty interesting things are on your mind. If these are not covered, they will go into the newsletter and we’ll try to cover them there for “Responds.”

Source One, Source Two, you shine brightly. Good job, good job [Applause]. When Frank did it and threw too many pieces of paper at the form’s head, I decided maybe we’d just call on for a while.  Thank you, thank you.

Glochanumora.