Please explain the impact of sacred sex and orgasm at this time of 5D. Will it raise our frequencies and help to accelerate the anchoring of 5D?
The biggest reason I didn’t want to take time for that during the meeting when that question was asked is that I really felt that I would have needed to explain how sacred sex was useful in 3D and 4D. The newsletter has a very capable community of readers, and if they want to get those earlier teachings on sacred sex they can research them pretty easily.
Something that I said in those teachings, and which is probably even more true now than it was then, is that the higher the frequency you work at, the less urgent are your physical needs. Those physical needs matter less, to the point that most high-frequency individuals just don’t have the same drive for sexual experiences as they did in 3D and 4D.
But does that mean that sacred sex and orgasm are no longer an effective means of using Creation Force energy? Well, actually it does. In 5D it’s no longer a very effective force for Creation energy. That has been happening over the last three or four years, and is certainly a part of the move to 5D, simply because your higher energetic selves are not fed by your physical experience anymore. And, whereas feelings of the physical and ways of working magic in the world could have been very powerful activities then, they really do not have that power now.
And if you think about it, why would 5D use sexual magic to create what 5D is already about?
When you were talking about sacred sex, you said that it’s the closest to Oneness that the physical person could get at that time. So I guess our frequencies are high enough now that we don’t need that push to Oneness.
Right, but let me clarify that a little. For one thing, the energies coming through in 5D right now don’t support that way of experiencing Oneness. But not everybody is working in 5D energy, and even those who are consciously working in 5D are not doing it all the time. The more you are seeking physical-world satisfaction, the less you are living your 5D function.
What were the main points of consideration in the decision to seed competitive violence into humanity?
I knew that it would be causing a few raised eyebrows when I called it competitive violence in the last interview.
Evolution is about competition, right? And so within your ancient brain there is a constant drive to survive—at any cost.
How many of you readers have ever thought, “I’m not a violent person at all. I abhor TV or movie violence. Come the Zombie Apocalypse, just kill me first. I would not make it.” And then someone does something to someone you love, and you start thinking, “Oh, I’m going to make them pay.” That’s part of your ancestral requirements, the “save yourself, protect your own.” And it’s the step right below—there’s barely space between them—it’s the step right below service to others, as opposed to service to self. But once that step from preserving self to preserving others comes into play—I probably shouldn’t have said “preserve” in there—but once it comes into play, it stops being competitive violence to others because you have enlarged your sense of self outside of your simple personality experience into including those you love.
Competitive violence gone awry is not only war, but it’s also such things as basketball fans taunting each other into a fight after a game. It is a protective mechanism, and what they’ve done is they have made sport a reflection of themselves. And you can fill in any kind of . . . golf fans will do that. I think, in fact, that ice hockey fans are known for it. It’s because they have merged their own identity with that of the team, so if you don’t like that team, you don’t like them. And if you don’t like them, they’re not safe. So they become violent to convince themselves that they are safe.
What should be happening is that their passion, combined with a focus on growth, brings an expansion of the heart, making it central to their vision of themselves, so that they move out of service to self and into service to others as a very natural result of that expansion of the heart. But if the heart does not expand, if the spirit cannot function through it, then it becomes a point of violent reaction of defending themselves, as they define that self in the world.
There is a second part to the question. How did competitive violence come into play with the Atlantean abuse of power?
All abuse of power is using competitive violence as a weapon rather than a function of growth.
You said that although we came into the world as Love, the ability to express it is not innate. It would seem that coming into the world able to express love from the beginning would help spirit function in form more easily. Why would we hamper an incarnation in that way?
You are Love. And you do come in expressing love, but it’s exceptionally limited. You learn how to expand and express through your experience here. However, you are Love. But when you are three weeks old, your only love is to be fed, to survive. That’s all there is. Everything is about you. And it is only through growth that you even understand the word love and begin to learn how to act on it. So it’s not quite correct to say that you come in without love—because you are love—but you come in without any skills to recognize it, and that creates, for a whole lot of people on this planet, a very tough journey.
As you can imagine, some children do not know what love is until they are adults, and I’m sorry to say that there are some adults in this world who still don’t know what love is. I would count even loving oneself in a horribly narcissistic kind of way as still love. But there are some in this world who don’t even have that.
You have said that timeline splits are always disruptive. How can we best deal with the current timeline split in the most effective way possible?
Feed the wolf of 5D. Feed it, feed it, feed it, feed it all you can, doing everything you can all the time. Eat, sleep, love. Eat, sleep, love. That’s not live comma pray comma laugh, whatever. I mean, eat and sleep love. Lovingly, love.
There are still genetic remnants of otherworldly helpers in some places that were once part of flourishing civilizations. Is this DNA still functional, perhaps able to be reactivated for some future purpose? Or is it just a lingering trace that will eventually fade?
If you’re functioning in 5D, it will reactivate. Until then, the answer is yes, it’s still there. Will it reactivate? Depends. Or will it just fade? It might, if you’re not functioning in 5D.
What potentials are related to that DNA? What might it confer when it’s activated?
A greater ability to function on your own, to think in constructive fashion, and to be far less limited by the very small sensory system you use in this world. It activates your superpowers.
I can easily imagine that up to 60% of humanity has some of this DNA, although I would not guarantee that number. I’m basing that on the spiritual work, the energetic Gateway work, that has been done, and where it has been done, which are, for the most part, near very large population areas. For instance, all the Dragon Energy that was activated stimulated the seeding of the civilization in that area, and that would reawaken some of the genetic structure. Every portal that was based in an area outside of Earth that was opened would also stimulate that latent genetic structure on a world-wide level.
But your beautiful, blue eyes are just a dominant part of what’s happened in your genetics. It’s not saying that you don’t also have genes for hazel or brown or green eyes that are not dominant. So having a possibility is not the same as having dominant or awakened genes.
So while I would agree that probably more than half of the world’s population has, within their genetics, otherworldly connections, I would not say it’s ever going to do anything, and it’s not something you want to seek. It will just start working, and you’ll notice it afterward.
Remember that your genetics goes a whole lot further than your personal DNA/RNA system. So yes, it’s a part of your unused, or probably unactivated, DNA, but it doesn’t matter because, until it’s okay to believe it, it’s not going to get out there in the world. The human ability to deny what is right in front of them is astonishing. And you will be hung from a tree or nailed to a cross, or some other way assassinated if you push that point beyond what mass consciousness can manage at the time. I’ve seen it over and over, and with some of you.
You’ve talked about paradigms needing to crumble, and that we don’t want to build on top of the foundations of old ones. The paradigm of capitalism seems to inherently create a system of haves and have-nots. Is there a way to make capitalism equitable and therefore something that is preserved under 5D, or is capitalism one of the paradigms that needs to crumble? And if so, what do we replace capitalism with that would be 5D and equitable? Attempts to do that have seemed to always fail miserably.
No philosophical system is in itself wrong. It is possible for capitalism, communism, or socialism to work in very good ways. Do they? No country does any of them really well, except maybe Finland. They’re best at everything. But what’s the common denominator that throws all those systems off? The people that run it and the greed that they have, because power has a tendency to shift away from checks and balances, and move into a desire for more and more power.
If your system did not use money, the dollar, as a function of power, but instead, as capitalism originally intended, as a means of exchange, that would be different. But whether it is diamonds or gold or dollar bills or poodles, no matter what, if you can hoard it and be over someone else because of it, then ultimately the system is going to break out of a social system and into a class system. And throughout the history of humanity, the class divisions have been the marker of power in a society.
I’ve said it before: This current environment is not about social injustice. The social injustice is the distraction, the smoke and mirrors. It distracts you from you realizing how desperately far apart the working class is from the ruling class.
And just to throw this out there: Europe spent 500 years being a perfect example of how the feudal system is problematic. America has spent 250 years trying to prove several thousand years of history is wrong. And they’re doing the best they can to have a ruling class and a serf class. And I don’t mean the big waves of Hawaii. I mean the desperately poor.
